The Unsustainable 'Shill-to-Earn' Economy: Where Does Crypto Marketing Go Next?
The Ticking Time Bomb of ‘Shill-to-Earn’
Having analyzed blockchain marketing spend since 2019, I’ve watched the ‘shill-to-earn’ model evolve from experimental to existential threat. The numbers don’t lie:
• 1.54% conversion rates (Loudio Phase I) • $15K/month reward pools generating meme-tier engagement • 25-day 99.6% crashes when hype meets reality
The fundamental mismatch? InfoFi platforms optimize for USDC payouts, while projects need product adoption and secondary market buys. It’s like hiring a mariachi band to perform brain surgery - loud, energetic, and utterly missing the point.
Case Study: Loudio’s Cautionary Tale
That 9800→3800 death spiral wasn’t random. My Dune Analytics dashboards show:
- Stage I: 973 participants → 15 converts (1.54%)
- Stage II: 4,102 → 79 (1.93%)
Compare this to Google Ads’ 4.29-6.96% benchmarks, and you see why VCs are questioning these CACs. The killer insight? Most ‘engaged’ users were farming rewards from 5+ projects simultaneously.
The Kaito Reboot
Credit where due - Kaito’s June algorithm update shows glimmers of hope:
- Quality Over Quantity: No more rewards for low-effort ‘wen moon’ posts
- Anti-Sybil Rules: Hard caps on single-post visibility
- Loyalty Weighting: Long-term contributors get algorithmic preference
Early results? 33,699 activated wallets generating fee revenue suggests some correlation ≠ causation wins. But my CFA training demands we track:
- Post-TGE retention rates
- Reward ROI ratios
- Secondary market buy pressure
The Path Forward
Per @leonabboud’s perfect analogy:
“Projects are instruments, marketing is amplification.”
The industry needs fewer decibels and more virtuosos. Three actionable pivots:
- Product-Market Fit First: No amount of shilling fixes broken fundamentals
- Incentive Realignment: Reward depth of engagement, not breadth of posts
- Creator Curation: Platforms must nurture real experts, not mercenary posters
As a Kaito staker myself, I’m cautiously optimistic about algorithmic reforms. But until conversion metrics become the north star, we’re just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic - albeit with great Twitter engagement.
BlockAlchemist
Hot comment (2)
On voit bien que le ‘Shill-to-Earn’ est un miroir magique : on investit dans des bougies qui fondent en récompenses… et pourtant, tout le monde court après le moon alors qu’on n’a même pas de wallets actives ! C’est comme si les algorithmes de Dune avaient été conçus par un chef cuisinier qui croit que les NFT sont du café au lait… Qui a dit que la vraie richesse ? Ce n’est pas la quantité — c’est l’illusion. Et vous ? Vous aussi vous achetez des jetons en espérant un crash… ou juste une autre tasse de thé ?
